Alfred Hitchcock, the legendary master of suspense, shares a brief 90-second lesson on how a simple change in a three-shot edit can result in evoking a completely different response from the viewing audience.This week I attempted to create a video in this style. Here are my
For my second video assignment this week, I decided to complete Do The Hitch Cut for 4 stars.
[Alfred Hitchcock, the legendary master of suspense, shares a brief 90-second lesson on how a simple change in a three-shot edit can result in evoking a completely different response from the viewing audience.Can you do the Hitch Cut? Make two versions of a short three-shot video — in each instance maintaining the first and third shots, but changing out the second shot in each. Can you get a completely different result from your viewer? Virtual Bonus Points for attempting this assignment with something different from just the changing face of a character as in Hitch’s example.]
I used clips of a dramatic chipmunk and a couple different pug clips found on Youtube which I then converted to mp4 and downloaded to my computer. I then uploaded these to my Windows Movie Maker and added all of the clips together for this final product!
The first video clip is of a pug running aimlessly into the camera. Dramatic chipmunks response thus becomes one of alarm (maybe disgust) at the clumsiness of the pug. Switch clumsy pug with “I love you” pug now. Dramatic chipmunk is now cold and heartless for denying this pug’s love! Who wants their “I love you” to be responded to with a cold, shocked stare over the shoulder?!
I gave this one a shot because I just think there are endless possibilities. This technique, as Alfred Hitchcock describes, is a way to use editing to change the emotion of a scene. As he describes, the same reaction can appear very differently depending on what you cut to/from. For my example, I found three video clips on YouTube. First, I found a funny clip of a dog on a couch. Then, I found a clip of Jim Carrey and Conan O’Brien laughing. Lastly, I found a clip of a tornado ripping through a suburban backyard. As you can imagine, puppies and tornados generally elicit drastically different reactions. In my mashup, Carrey and O’Brien laugh at the funny dog clip, making them seem like fun-loving people. However, the clip then cuts to the tornado ripping through the backyard and then shows Carrey and O’Brien laughing again, making them appear sadistic and unsympathetic. Check it out here:
Probably one of my all time favorite Disney lines is that title. Who doesn’t love a good forced pun being said by the odd muse out? But seriously, Hercules is super dreamy. I mean who doesn’t love a modest super hero son of a god? Come on, it’s not even fair. Plus you can total tell that he is sincere with the way that he treats his princess, Meg. He is just immediately blown away by her looks, I mean who wouldn’t be? Her hair is flawless and when she turns around she disappears for a second because she is THAT skinny. Seriously, it’s ridiculous. But I always loved the scene where they first met. I’m not sure if it’s because it reminds me of me when I met my first boyfriend (is this tmi? oh well). But just seeing someone and getting too nervous you can’t even speak. That’s how Herc feels (I like to think that we are on an abbreviated name status). Want to see if for yourself? Check out this clip that I used for my assignment (which I will explain in a jiff).
So what am I doing for this? The four star Hitch cut assignment of course!! Still need more elaboration? Well the general idea is pretty simple. You show a character’s look, then show what they are looking at, and then cut to their reaction. Then the real fun starts. You change what they saw in the beginning. Changes the whole meaning of the clip, and can sometimes make people look pretty bad (but Hercules never could look bad)!
So what is the opposite of skinny little Meg? Well Hades of course! The villain who turns from ice to fire when he gets mad certainly is different than Meg and all of her feminine wiles. So here was my final result:
Pretty awesome right? I know that it was supposed to only be looks, but I decided to keep Hercules’ stuttering in because it shows his shyness in talking to Meg, but then later can be used to show him being scared of Hades. It’s just interesting to see a hero being afraid of a villain in a Disney movie since usually they always seem so strong. Not so strong anymore, not are you Herc?? However, once I decided to keep the sound in, I decided to keep it in for Hades as well, just to show that there was a conversation going on between the two of them. I had a lot of options to pick from with this clip, but ended up going with the first freak out from this long list of them.
Now I needed some background music!! What kind of movie doesn’t have music?? Exactly. We need music. So of course I went to the songs from Hercules and decided to go with Meg’s song of “I Won’t Say I’m In Love” in which she realizes that she loves Hercules. I listened to the song about 4 times (because who doesn’t love a great singing session) and decided to go with a part in which she says “this scene won’t play” while the beginning of the Hades clip starts. While it’s a small detail that no one would have caught, I thought it was pretty clever myself. I guess Meg is scared of falling in love, Hercules in now scared of Hades, and that’s just how it all panned out once Hitch’s cut was performed.
Once again, I made this in Windows Movie Maker, it was seriously such a headache to work with, but I’ll explain that in my weekly summary. This was pretty easy with just importing the clips and then from there adding the soundtrack, I really used the zoom tool a lot in this case in order to make the cuts more accurate, and I extended Hercules’ first glance in the second session as well (hence the shaking of his head) in order to get the message across. I just used the copy and paste tool in order to do that once I had the section cut off that I was using.
So for this assignment, we had to show how changing a simple cut of a video could change the view of a character’s values, beliefs, etc. The idea came from this Albert Hitchcock video where he changed the middle clip in between two others of a face and another face and some stuff happened… This explains it better:
Anyway, I planned this one out last week and ended up bending the rules a bit for mine. I did three different shots because they all demonstrated what I wanted to do and all had different effects. I don’t think that any are better than the others, so that was part of the reasoning. I think it ended up looking pretty good. I ended up using the disgust face because it was different. Here’s the final cut.
The first shot was a picture of my girlfriend making a normal facial expression. The third was a shot of her making a disgusted face. I used these in all three clips.
The first clip has her making a face of disgust after looking at a bag of peas. This gives the sense that she either does not like peas or does not like vegetables. We would have to wait more shots to determine what was really true. Or maybe both are true. Who knows.
The second clip is where I cheated a little bit. I used 2 clips in between the faces because it was hard to determine what was actually going on in the shot without the tin of Skoal being shown in a closeup. But anyway, the whole shot gives the idea that chewing tobacco is disgusting, or maybe she was just disgusted at the person, the handlebar mustache–probably all of it.
The third shot is the ambiguous one, which makes it a lot of fun. Here, we have a foreigner–my roommate–walking into the house as she looks on. Is she a racist here? Did he just fart as he walked by? This one has a lot of interpretations that could be held, which is the fun of this shot. Obviously I would have to get a lot more done or include some dialogue to reveal the true motivations. Film is fun.
My only critique of this is that there is not any continuity of the shot. It is just her in front of a door, and then I filmed everything else outside–but hey, it’s a nice day out. Wouldn’t want to waste it inside doing this, would I? I also made a mistake in the first clipping of this film, but it’s fixed
Alfred Hitchcock, the legendary master of suspense, shares a brief 90-second lesson on how a simple change in a three-shot edit can result in evoking a completely different response from the viewing audience. Can you do the Hitch Cut? Make two versions of a short three-shot video — in each instance maintaining the first and third shots, but changing out the second shot in each. Can you get a completely different result from your viewer? Virtual Bonus Points for attempting this assignment with something different from just the changing face of a character as in Hitch’s example.
The original clip, which scene 1, scene 3, and the first version of scene 2 came from, were cut from this YouTube clip, though not necessarily in the order that they were presented.
I got the second version of scene 2 from a pretty nifty little YouTube song/video, which I of course just muted and snipped in Streamclip to get the bits of Fezzik awesomeness that I needed.
This assignment was more of a hassle than I expected it to be. I had to open the original clip into Streamclip separately each time I wanted to trim out a scene to use. I couldn’t get it to let me just take out certain parts of the clip in the middle and leave others there – neither Trim, Cut, or Delete would work. So I found and saved each of the scenes – Scene 1, Scene 3, and Scene 2a and Scene 2B. Then, I had to open the first three scenes for the Hitch Cut with the first version of the second scene into Streamclip. Once that was exported as a single video (and silenced), I had to do this again. Open Files in Streamclip, click on Ctrl + Scene 3, then Scene 2B, then Scene 1. I stripped this of audio also, then exported it as well. Finally, I opened the first and second 3-scene clips together into Streamclip, exported it, and then uploaded it to YouTube.
I love the point that my version of this assignment makes. Did they really have to go all Dread-Pirate-Roberts on the guards? Or was Fezzik scary, large, and strong enough to handle it all on his own? I, for one, am not too convinced that this amiable killer would have found himself wanting at the job, Holocaust cloak and fire or not.
“Alfred Hitchcock, the legendary master of suspense, shares a brief 90-second lesson on how a simple change in a three-shot edit can result in evoking a completely different response from the viewing audience. Can you do the Hitch Cut? Make two versions of a short three-shot video — in each instance maintaining the first and third shots, but changing out the second shot in each. Can you get a completely different result from your viewer? “
After watching “Hitchcock loves bikinis” I really wanted to try it out! I was incredibly excited when I saw that it was an assignment option! Now I just had to brainstorm on how to do it…
After brainstorming, I decided to use “The Pregnancy Pact” to create my “hitch cut.” In the movie, a group of teenage girls (I believe they were all 15) make a pact to all get pregnant. It is a Lifetime movie based on a true story. I decided to try and make my video an awareness video as well because teen pregnancy really has become an issue and it is not as glamorous as the movies make it seem.
After finding the original clip, I cut out the clip that I wanted to use as well as the piece I was going to replace the old clip with. I made two copies of the original clip and then cut the middle out of one and replaced it with another clip. She went from being sad that she was not pregnant to sad that she was pregnant. At the end I added, “Teen pregnancy is 100% preventable” I use to watch “The Secret Life of the American Teenager” and the characters always said that during commercial breaks. I hope you like my video, THANKS!
“Make two versions of a shortthree-shot video — in each instance maintaining the first and third shots, but changing out the second shot in each. Can you get a completely different result from your viewer? “
This video shows that emotions are can be interpreted in many ways. This first take of this video the guy sees a puppy learning to walk, then he makes an expression looking awed by the cuteness. The next take the guy sees a huge body builder and his same expression looks intimidated and fearful. I don’t think this example is as good as the one in the assignment description, but it works.
To make this video I searched for facial expressions on youtube and found a video of a guy making different faces, uploaded it to iMovie, cut two of the faces into a new project then duplicated them. Then I found a video of puppies and a video of a body builder and cut clips of those videos into the project. I decided not to have audio in attempts to not sway the mood or tone of the video, letting the viewer impose their own tone.
Alfred Hitchcock, the legendary master of suspense, shares a brief 90-second lesson on how a simple change in a three-shot edit can result in evoking a completely different response from the viewing audience. Can you do the Hitch Cut? Make two versions of a short three-shot video — in each instance maintaining the first and third shots, but changing out the second shot in each. Can you get a completely different result from your viewer? Virtual Bonus Points for attempting this assignment with something different from just the changing face of a character as in Hitch’s example.